Melt Cosmetics Pink Moon Digital Dust Highlight Review & Swatches

Reviews
Feb 27, 2019

Pink Moon

Melt Cosmetics Pink Moon Digital Dust Highlight ($39.00 for zero.28 oz.) is a light-medium pink with hotter, extra pink-coral undertones and cooler, pink-to-violet sparkle. It had a flippantly metallic end that managed to not emphasize my pores and skin’s pure texture. It had good shade protection however wanted a second layer for opaque protection. The consistency felt drier to the contact, and it appeared to use much less exactly as extra product dispersed extra readily on my pores and skin. I’d suggest utilizing a lighter contact or smaller brush for extra exact software (if one doesn’t intend to put on it all-over the cheeks!). It sat properly on my pores and skin, although, and it didn’t seem dry or dusty as soon as blended out. It wore effectively for eight hours on me earlier than fading a bit.

Makeup Revolution Peach Kiss (P, $9.00) is extra shimmery (90% comparable).Wet ‘n’ Wild Botanic Dream (P, $four.99) is darker (90% comparable).Fenty Beauty Rose on Ice (P, $28.00) is much less shimmery, darker (85% comparable).Tom Ford Beauty Soleil Bloom (LE, $80.00) is extra shimmery, hotter (85% comparable).MAC Springsheen (P, $24.00) is darker, cooler (80% comparable).MAC Margin (P, $24.00) is darker, hotter (80% comparable).MAC Just a Pinch (P, $27.00) is much less shimmery, darker (80% comparable).Too Faced Papa Don’t Peach (P, $30.00) is darker (80% comparable).Maybelline Barely Pink (202) (LE, $eight.99) is much less shimmery, darker, hotter (80% comparable).MAC Peachykeen (P, $24.00) is much less shimmery, darker (80% comparable).

Formula Overview

$39.00/zero.28 oz. – $139.29 Per Ounce

The model would not have an ideal description of the highlighter formulation typically, simply descriptions of every shade. The lightest shade–Stargazer–is described as “buildable” however the different two are silent with respect to pigmentation, and the lightest shade was fairly pigmented. Since there was no basic description, I am holding the formulation to the common powder highlighter’s claims–pigmented, long-wearing, and blendable, besides Stargazer, which I might count on to have “buildable” pigmentation. The formulation has a denser, firmer texture, but it surely by no means felt stiff nor was it tough to mix out on the pores and skin. The protection was semi-opaque and buildable with a high-shine to metallic end. All three lasted eight hours on me.

Ingredients

MICA, CETEARYL ETHYLHEXANOATE, HDI/TRIMETHYLOL HEXYLLACTONE CROSSPOLYMER, SQUALANE, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, GLYCERIN, POLYSORBATE 20, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, 1,2-HEXANEDIOL, CHONDRUS CRISPUS (CARRAGEENAN), XANTHAN GUM, PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-t-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE, SILICA, DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE, SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE, TIN OXIDE. May Contain: TITANIUM DIOXIDE CI 77891, IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492), CARMINE (CI 75470)

We hope you may contemplate supporting Temptalia. Thanks!

About the Reviewer

Christine has normal-to-dry pores and skin with areas of dryness (cheeks, nostril, and underneath the eyes). She has a light-medium skintone with refined, hotter yellow undertones. Her greatest basis matches embody: Tarte Rainforest of the Sea in Light-Medium Neutral (greatest match), Estee Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Makeup in Desert Beige 2N1, Giorgio Armani Maestro Glow in four.zero, Hourglass Warm Ivory Vanish Seamless Finish, Laura Mercier Candleglow Soft Luminous in Dusk, MAC NC20/NC25, Make Up For Ever Ultra HD Liquid in Y305 (140).

Cart Item Removed. Undo
  • No products in the cart.