Make Up For Ever 101: Review of Diamond Powder and Shades of White Stars

Reviews
December 23, 2018 December 23, 2018

101 whites

The White Star Lit Diamond Powder Make Up For Ever 101 ($ 26.00 for 0.08 oz) seemed to have a translucent base and lots of micro-glitter and silver and white glitter. It seemed thicker and more glittery than most colors in the range (its texture was very similar to 102 White Gold). It could only be covered if applied on a sticky base or used with a glitter adhesive, but it did not accumulate naturally and tended to hide when working dry, regardless of its ability.

Overall, it applied even less impressively, whether to the eyes or cheeks, although he was more likely to stay on my cheeks than on my eyes. I would not care about this hue, unless you plan to use it with a glitter adhesive, where it will be easier to use (less fallout), will have easier pigmentation to build (almost opaque), and will actually last longer than a few hours ago. almost constant drop of glitter in the eyes. Some of the other shades were more dry-safe, although they were still using a moistened brush / adhesive product better, but I did not find that it worked well remotely autonomously and should have been marketed only to be used with. something to hold.

Too Faced Frostbite Me (LE, $ 16.00) is darker, more pigmented, warmer (similar to 90%). Cosmic Urban Disintegration (P, $ 20.00) is darker, more pigmented, warmer (similar to 90%) .MAC Frostwinked (LE, $ 20.00) is darker, more pigmented, warmer (similar to 90%) .MAC Plumluxe # 1 (PiP,) is more pigmented, warmer (85%) .Giorgio Armani Moonlight (06) (P, $ 36.00) is less shimmery, darker, more pigmented (similar to 85%) .Giorgio Armani Day (31) (P, $ 39.00) is less shiny, cooler (85% similar) .Lancome Sparkling White (LE, $ 26.00) is darker, more pigmented, warmer (85% similar). MAC Angelic (P, $ 21.00) is less shimmering, darker, colder (85% similar) .Natasha Denona Sparks (PiP,) is warmer (85% similar) .Too Faced Frost (LE, 16.00 $) is less shimmery, darker, more pigmented (similar to 85%) .

Preview of the formula

$ 26.00 / 0.08 oz. – $ 325.00 per ounce

The formula is said to be “constructible, fuse, [and] reflecting light” and can be used for the eyes, face and body. The brand says that they can be applied with “brush or fingers” and although they say that “for a cleaner application and a stronger hold, a wet brush with” an adhesive spray, it means that & # 39; It can be used without a less crisp / less outfit. The powders seem as finely ground as they are, but they have a micro-shine and a shine that gives them a drier, almost loose and shimmering texture. Some shades seemed to have a stronger base color than others, which were overall more glittering with a transparent or plain base.

I wore several on the cheeks as well as on the eyes, most hues working properly without adhesive spray / sticky base, but the wearing time was six to eight hours with light to moderate spills ( depending on the shade) of the eyes. and eight hours on the cheeks with a spark migration over time. I would definitely recommend using the product with an adhesive spray for a “cleaner application and a stronger hold”, according to the brand.

Ingredients

We hope you will consider supporting Temptalia Thank you!

About the reviewer

Christine has normal to dry skin with dry areas (cheeks, nose and under the eyes). She has a light-medium complexion with subtle and warmer yellow hues. Her best founding matches include: Tropical Rainforest in Medium to Neutral Light (Best Match), Estee Lauder Double Wear Long Wear in Beige 2N1, Giorgio Armani Maestro Glow in 4.0, Hourglass Ivory Hourglass Finish, Laura Mercier Candleglow Soft Luminous at dusk, MAC NC20 / NC25, Liquid Make Up for Ever Ultra HD at Y305 (140).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *